Un poco de noticias.
Los diez puntos que propone Irán.
An American guarantee of nonaggression with Iran.
In the earlier, 15-point proposal offered by U.S. mediators, only a cease-fire was on offer. Iranian officials want to ensure a formalized end to hostilities that is more permanent.
This is one of the main demands, according to interviews with regional security figures and a former Iranian diplomat, that Iran will focus on.
Punto lógico por donde empezar.
Iran maintains control of the Strait of Hormuz.
This is likely to become a major sticking point. Iran’s ability to strangle traffic through the strait, through which a fifth of the world’s oil passes, has wreaked havoc on the global economy. It is very unlikely that Washington or Iran’s Gulf Arab neighbors would accept this.
Punto peligroso y más sabiendo las islas que robó a sus vecinos.
Aquí se deben de poner de acuerdo los países del Golfo para su gestión.
Ending the regional war on all fronts, including against Iran’s ally, Hezbollah, in Lebanon.
This could become an eventual point of alignment.
The United States and Israel want Tehran to curb an alliance of militias it has fostered across the region, which it calls the “Axis of Resistance.” Many of those militias have come to Iran’s defense in the current war, launching drone and missile attacks on U.S. targets, Gulf countries and Israel. Among them was the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, to which Israel responded with a major offensive. Israel then announced plans to occupy parts of southern Lebanon.
Israel says the current cease-fire does not apply to its operations in Lebanon. Whether the Lebanon front can be brought into a longer-term deal is an open question.
Imposible de hacer. Están pidiendo amnistía para grupos terroristas. Que se olviden. Ellos mismos son un estado terrorista, no puedes esperar menos.
Withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from all bases and positions in the region.
U.S. forces maintain bases across Gulf Arab states, Israel and Iraq. It is difficult to conceive of a scenario in which the U.S. would accept this.
Irrealizable y estúpido.
Están pidiendo carta blanca para atacar cuando les venga en gana. Algo al estilo ruso y el desarme de Ucrania.
Esas bases están ahí de mutuo acuerdo con el resto de países del Golfo, porque las necesitan y estos mismos las quieren y necesitan.
Reparations to Iran for war damages.
Iran has sustained a devastating level of destruction, not only to its military sites but to critical infrastructure, including pharmaceutical and steel plants, bridges, universities and energy facilities.
There has been no indication that U.S. officials would consider offering compensation.
Por pedir, que no quede.
Estaría bien pedirles a ellos lo mismo con el resto de países atacados.
Acceptance of Iran’s right to nuclear enrichment.
This is diametrically opposed to Mr. Trump’s most recent statements, in which he has again called for zero enrichment of uranium.
Some regional diplomats have aimed to soften U.S. demands, suggesting Tehran could instead agree not to actively conduct enrichment, or to limit enrichment to a symbolic amount at the lowest threshold for civilian purposes. It remains unclear whether Washington would accept that.
Pero si decían que no lo estaban haciendo!.
Para qué querrán estos terroristas enriquecer uranio?. huhmmm
Lifting all primary sanctions on Iran.
Washington has imposed on Iran different forms of primary sanctions, or direct restrictions on financial transactions, since the founding of the Islamic Republic after the 1979 revolution.
In previous negotiations, mediators aimed for U.S. officials to lift some sanctions in exchange for concessions on Iran’s nuclear program. Mr. Trump’s own statement on Wednesday touched on the idea of offering “Tariff and Sanctions relief.”
Mientras sigan siendo un grupo terrorista en si, masacrando a su población, enriqueciendo uranio para fines militares, proyectando su poder a través de grupos terroristas creados por ellos mismos, que se olviden.
Lifting all secondary sanctions on Iran.
In addition to its directly blocking trade with Iran, the United States also imposes sanctions that penalize other countries or non-American companies that do business with Iran.
Like the point on primary sanctions, this part of the proposal would likely be negotiable depending on what Iran offers.
Este y el anterior van relacionados.
No sea que compren a mansalva tecnología y armamento.
Termination of all resolutions against Iran by the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Last June, the U.N. nuclear watchdog passed a resolution against Iran for the first time in 20 years, saying that Iran was not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations, a move Iran condemned as political.
Washington cannot force the I.A.E.A to repeal its resolutions, but it could perhaps pressure allied countries to do this as part of a comprehensive deal with Iran.
Este punto se entiende en conjunto con el de dejarles enriquecer uranio a granel.
Termination of all United Nations Security Council resolutions against Iran.
There have been several U.N. resolutions against Iran, particularly on the issue of nuclear proliferation. Last October, the United Nations reimposed sanctions on Iran, saying Iran was in breach of a 2015 deal to limit Iran’s nuclear enrichment.
Washington could try to influence its allies to do this, but again, it would likely require a comprehensive agreement with Iran.
Porque son todo un gran ejemplo democratico y de progreso.
Total, que solo presentan un punto viable, el resto son claros ejemplos de que son despreciables.
Tan despreciables que siguen atacando a los países del Golfo después de llorar por un alto el fuego.
En breve tendrán que poner a otro al frente, porque el actual está para abonar flores. A ver quien se atreve...
![[tomaaa]](/images/smilies/nuevos2/tomaa.gif "toma")
![[facepalm]](/images/smilies/facepalm.gif "facepalm")
![[fiu]](/images/smilies/fiu.gif "disimulando")
