¿Cual cable USB Type-C comprar?, la complicacion de lo trivial ..

En extremetech.com hay un articulo que invita a la reflexion, sobre ¿cual cable USB type-C hay que comprar? cuando en principio cualquiera deberia servir, aunque visto lo visto no es tan sencillo. No esta por demas que lean el articulo porque sino elegimos el adecuado a lo que necesitamos, nos llevamos un mal sabor de boca.

https://www.extremetech.com/electronics ... -nightmare
http://blog.fosketts.net/2016/10/29/tot ... #fn-9436-7
http://www.theverge.com/2016/2/4/109162 ... ower-cords

Joel Hruska, extremetech.com escribió:[..]

USB-C can be used to handle anything from USB2 communication speeds, to USB 3.1 Gen 1 (aka USB 3.0) and USB 3.1 Gen 2 (the faster variant, with 10Gbps transfer speeds, 15W – 100W of power delivery, and support for Alternate Mode connections). Then, at the top, you’ve got Thunderbolt 3 — a standard designed to vastly increase transfer speeds, that’s capable of driving an external GPU, array of hard drives, or other high-end peripherals.

But therein lies the problem. The actual USB-C cables being sold on the market support a huge range of features.

Imagen

Each one of these cables has a different set of capabilities, and the differences aren’t necessarily apparent to people who aren’t fluent in technology. Up until now, you’ve generally been able to buy USB cables and adapters based solely on price, safe in the assumption that a USB 3.0 cable is a USB 3.0 cable. Now, that’s no longer the case. We can see evidence of how this is shaking out in Apple’s product line. This isn’t to pick on Apple, though I’ve been critical of multiple decisions the company has made — they’re the only company that has adopted USB-C significantly.

[..]

USB-C cable quality is… less than great

We’ve written about efforts from Benson Leung to diagnose faulty USB-C cables, call out the bad manufacturers, and tell consumers what hardware is worth buying. Both Leung and Verge writer Dieter Bohn lost hardware thanks to faulty cabling, and it’s a significant quality control issue. Nathan K on Google Plus has been building his own extensive database of good and bad cables, as well as deep dives into how USB-C charging is implemented on the Pixel and Pixel XL smartphones. Long story short — despite advertising the capability to charge at 18W, these devices never do unless you literally take steps to force them into using 9V. The 5V option, which is what the Pixel “wants,” tops out at 15W.

Between the vastly different cable types and the highly variable quality control, we recommend thorough research before purchasing any USB-C peripherals or cables. There’s high-quality equipment available, but you need to search for it. Don’t trust manufacturer ad copy; check actual testing.
0 respuestas