Excepto que:
VI.2 escribió:...NOTHING IN THIS LICENSE SHALL IMPLY OR BE CONSTRUED AS A PROMISE, OBLIGATION, OR COVENANT NOT TO SUE FOR COPYRIGHT OR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT IF YOU DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS LICENSE.
Vamos, que pueden llegar a demandar a la distro o al usuario si no cumples con las condiciones de su licencia (va más allá de las infracciones de marca).
Veamos algunas perlas de la licencia:
VI.7 escribió:7. IF (IN RELEVANT CONTEXT) ANY PROVISION OF CHAPTER IV OF THIS LICENSE IS UNENFORCEABLE, INVALID, OR PROHIBITED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW IN YOUR JURISDICTION, YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS UNDER THIS LICENSE AND YOU MUST NOT USE, COPY, MODIFY, CREATE DERIVATIVE WORKS OF, NOR (RE)DISTRIBUTE THIS PRODUCT, NOR ANY PORTION(S) THEREOF.
Basicamente si alguna de las leyes de nuestra jurisdicción no se adecuan a lo que dice el capitulo IV, perdemos los derechos que pudiesemos tener con esta licencia.
dark_hunter escribió:Vale, me pasa por no leerme la licencia entera
Bueno, según su licencia el no hacerlo y/o no entender sus condiciones de uso es motivo suficiente para anular los derechos otorgados en esa licencia:
VI.6 escribió:6. IF YOU ARE NOT SURE WHETHER YOU UNDERSTAND ALL PARTS OF THIS LICENSE OR IF YOU ARE NOT SURE WHETHER YOU CAN COMPLY WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS LICENSE, YOU MUST NOT USE, COPY, MODIFY, CREATE DERIVATIVE WORKS OF, NOR (RE)DISTRIBUTE THIS PRODUCT, NOR ANY PORTION(S) OF IT. YOU SHOULD CONSULT WITH A LAWYER.
oMega_2093 escribió:>> The complete source code of Your Product must be freely and publicly available (for exceptions, see Section III.2) at least until You cease to distribute Your Product.
La sección III.2 nos manda a la III.1.d en caso de querer redistribuir el producto, ya sea una distro (lo que hace normalmente) o uno mismo:
III.1.d escribió:Portions of the source code of Your Product not contained in This Product (e.g., portions added by You in creating Your Product, whether created by You or by third parties) must be available under license(s) that (however, see also Subsection III.1.e) allow(s) anyone to modify and derive new works from the portions of the source code that are not contained in This Product and to use, copy, and redistribute such modifications and/or derivative works. The license(s) must be perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free, no-charge, and worldwide, and must not invalidate, weaken, restrict, interpret, amend, modify, interfere with or otherwise affect any part, term, provision, or clause of this License. The text(s) of the license(s) must be included with every copy of Your Product that You make and distribute.
Por ejemplo la GPL nos permite
cobrar por el software, y en este caso la licencia (que estamos obligados a usar de acuerdo a III.1.e) no nos permite hacer esto, aparte de que la licencia que usemos para el codigo derivado debe aplicar en todo el mundo (lo cual se contradice en la clausula VI.7,
), por lo tanto no puedes usar la licencia de truecrypt para ello.
En fin, no niego que truecrypt sea un buen software pero su licencia deja mucho que desear. Volviendo al tema, has probado eCryptfs?
